ASC to crack down on paid social media endorsements

New guidelines for endorsers and influencers to come into effect next year

A crackdown is finally coming on sponsored bloggers and influencers in Canada in the way of new rules that will require full disclosure of any paid endorsements or mentions of products and services.

The new guidelines, by Advertising Standards Canada, will come into effect by early 2017. They apply to bloggers and individuals who use social media—including Twitter, Instagram, Facebook and Snapchat—to talk up companies and their brands in exchange for remuneration of any kind.

“Endorsement or testimonials must disclose any material connection between the endorser, reviewer or influencer and the entity that makes a product or service available,” says Janet Feasby, vice-president of standards at ASC. “If there is a connection, it must be clearly and properly disclosed in proximity to the representation of the product.”

Canada lags the United States in implementing such disclosure rules: The U.S. Federal Trade Commission, concerned that consumers were being misled by supposedly independent individuals who were being paid by companies to endorse their brands online, enacted guidelines in 2009. The FTC has the power to fine violators, as it did in 2011 when it hit a Nashville-based instructional DVD maker with a $250,000 (U.S.) penalty.

The government agency is now looking at tightening the rules since many bloggers and influencers are skirting them by burying or otherwise obfuscating their disclosures.

“If consumers don’t read the words, then there is no effective disclosure,” an FTC official recently told Bloomberg. “If you have seven other hashtags at the end of a tweet and it’s mixed up with all these other things, it’s easy for consumers to skip over that. The real test is, did consumers read it and comprehend it?”

Feasby says Advertising Standards Canada decided to update its guidelines after receiving a complaint about sponsored content. Unlike the FTC, the ASC is a self-regulating body and not a government agency so it will not have the ability to issue fines.

The ASC, which has been administering the Canadian Code of Advertising Standards since 1963, instead asks violators to cease their offending actions. In the case of refusal, the organization asks the medium on which the offending ad ran to block its recurrence. “It’s very rare that someone does not comply,” Feasby says.

Fine-issuing power would likely lie with the Competition Bureau, Feasby adds, which does not yet have formal rules requiring blogger and influencer disclosure.

The Competition Bureau says lack of disclosure by bloggers and influencers could fall under its rules against misrepresentation and false advertising.

“Creating representations that appear to be the authentic experiences or opinions of impartial third parties is sometimes referred to as astro-turfing, a type of conduct that the Bureau has taken action on recently,” says spokesman Phil Norris.

One case of such action came last year, when Bell Canada was fined $1.2 million for having employees post fake reviews of its apps.

“Ultimately, whether a particular representation is false or misleading in a material respect is determined on a case-by-case basis,” Norris says.

Citing confidentiality, he could not confirm whether the Bureau is currently looking into any potential violations.

This article originally appeared at

See all comments Recent Comments Business

Most Canadian bloggers and social media influencers already follow these guidelines to comply with FTC demands. Virtually no online property is exclusive to Canadians, making it necessary to comply with the advertising rules of other countries. Beyond that, most value the trust of their readers above all else and feel full disclosure is important.

That said, I highly doubt there is a single Canadian online who isn’t aware that sponsorship can play a significant part in any blog or social media post. Disclosure is great, but there’s no need to go overboard with notification. That will only annoy consumers and accomplish little else, other than complicating both compliance and enforcement.

Sunday, August 28 @ 12:45 pm |


Interesting. I wonder how they will differentiate between when there is a payed sponsorship and when a blogger legitimately wants to promote a product because they find it useful in their lives or want to give a brand props for being awesome. It will be interesting to see what comes of this and how it is regulated.

Friday, August 26 @ 12:20 pm |

Add a comment

You must be to comment.

Brands Articles

30 Under 30 is back with a new name, new outlook

No more age limit! The New Establishment brings 30 Under 30 in a new direction, starting with media professionals.

Diageo’s ‘Crown on the House’ brings tasting home

After Johnnie Walker success, Crown Royal gets in-home mentorship

Survey says Starbucks has best holiday cup

Consumers take sides on another front of Canada's coffee war

KitchenAid embraces social for breast cancer campaign

Annual charitable campaign taps influencers and the social web for the first time

Heart & Stroke proclaims a big change

New campaign unveils first brand renovation in 60 years

Best Buy makes you feel like a kid again

The Union-built holiday campaign drops the product shots

Volkswagen bets on tech in crisis recovery

Execs want battery-powered cars, ride-sharing to 'fundamentally change' automaker

Simple strategies for analytics success

Heeding the 80-20 rule, metrics that matter and changing customer behaviors

Why IKEA is playing it up downstairs

Inside the retailer's Market Hall strategy to make more Canadians fans of its designs